Saturday, May 9, 2026
Sections
The International American
Sections

Vance Sits Across From Iran for the First Direct U.S. Talks Since 1979

The Islamabad negotiations stretched past midnight as the two sides clashed over Hormuz, Lebanon, and enriched uranium. Pakistani mediators called the tone 'largely positive.' The stalemate over the strait persists.

The International American · April 11, 2026 · 4 min read
Share
Vice President JD Vance speaking at the Munich Security Conference. Vance led the American delegation in Islamabad on Saturday for the first direct U.S.-Iran negotiations since 1979, with talks stretching past midnight over Hormuz, Lebanon, and enriched uranium.(Munich Security Conference)

The United States and Iran sat across a table in Islamabad on Saturday and talked. That sentence, by itself, is historic. The last time American and Iranian officials held direct, face-to-face negotiations was before the revolution that overthrew the Shah in 1979. Forty-seven years of severed relations, proxy wars, hostage crises, and mutual hostility have passed since then. On Day 43 of the Iran war, with a fragile two-week ceasefire holding and oil still above $95, the two sides finally met.

Vice President JD Vance led the American delegation, joined by Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. The Iranian side was led by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Pakistan hosted, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir facilitating.

The talks stretched past midnight local time, according to the Washington Post. Pakistani sources told CNN that the tone remained "largely positive." The stalemate over the Strait of Hormuz persists.

What They Discussed

Three issues dominate the negotiations, and all three remain unresolved.

The first is the Strait of Hormuz. The United States demands unconditional reopening, "without limitation, including tolls," as White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters earlier in the week. Iran views the strait as its primary leverage and is unwilling to relinquish control without a guarantee that the war will not resume. ADNOC's CEO told a conference this week that the strait is "not open" despite the ceasefire, with access "restricted, conditioned, and controlled" by Iran. WTI surged above $100 intraday on the news before settling at $97.87.

The second is Lebanon. Iran's 10-point proposal explicitly calls for ending fighting against "regional allies," meaning Hezbollah. The United States maintains that Lebanon is not part of the bilateral ceasefire. Israel has continued striking Lebanon throughout the truce, killing at least 203 people in its deadliest wave of bombing since the war began, according to Lebanon's health ministry. Iran views this as a ceasefire violation. The White House does not.

The third is Iran's enriched uranium stockpile. The American 15-point framework demands its surrender. Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities have already been destroyed by the air campaign, but Tehran retains some quantity of enriched material whose disposition is a central question for any final agreement.

The Delegation Dynamics

The American team's composition reflects the Trump administration's preference for personal loyalty over institutional expertise. Vance has no prior diplomatic portfolio. Witkoff is a real estate executive. Kushner's Middle East experience is the Abraham Accords, which succeeded by finding creative frameworks that allowed all parties to claim victory.

That approach may be what the Islamabad talks require. Career diplomats bring institutional knowledge but also institutional caution. This negotiation has a two-week clock. The ceasefire expires on April 22. If the talks produce nothing, the bombing resumes and the diplomatic window may not reopen.

Iran's choice of Qalibaf, the parliament speaker, rather than a purely foreign ministry team signals that the regime's domestic political establishment is invested in the outcome. Qalibaf is a pragmatist within the Iranian system, a former IRGC commander and Tehran mayor who has positioned himself as a figure capable of bridging the revolutionary establishment and practical governance. His presence suggests Mojtaba Khamenei has authorized a real negotiation, not a stalling exercise.

What Pakistan Brings

Islamabad is not a neutral backdrop. Pakistan shares a 560-mile border with Iran. Its military intelligence services maintain channels into both the IRGC and the CIA. It has historical relationships with both sides that no other intermediary can replicate.

Pakistan's own interests are direct. The war has disrupted energy supplies it depends on. Iranian instability on its western border creates refugee pressures and security risks. Hosting successful talks gives Islamabad diplomatic prestige it needs after years of economic crisis and political turbulence.

NPR reported that Pakistani officials described the first session as "substantive" and noted that both delegations agreed to continue talking Sunday. The fact that the talks ran past midnight and both sides returned suggests neither has concluded the exercise is futile.

The Clock

Eleven days remain on the ceasefire. The military facts are established: Iran's nuclear program is destroyed, its navy is gone, its air defenses are dismantled. The regime has been punished for killing approximately 600 to 1,000 Americans over four decades. What the military achieved cannot be undone at the table.

The question is whether both sides can find a formula that lets the shooting stay stopped. Iran needs sanctions relief and a guarantee against resumed bombing. The United States needs Hormuz open and Iran's remaining enriched uranium accounted for. The outlines of a deal are visible. Whether Islamabad produces one depends on whether Vance and Qalibaf can close the gap on Hormuz before the clock runs out.

The first direct U.S.-Iran talks in 47 years are underway. They stretched past midnight. Both sides came back Sunday. That is not a deal. It is something rarer in this conflict: a reason for cautious optimism.

IranVanceIslamabadPakistanCeasefireDiplomacyHormuz

Related Stories

Iran's New Supreme Leader Is Still the IRGC's Man. That Shapes What Washington Can Negotiate.

Mojtaba Khamenei was installed in March under Revolutionary Guard pressure rather than clerical consensus, and his first major public appearance outside Tehran on May 1 underlined a political reality that should be central to American strategy: the man Witkoff is negotiating with through the Omani channel cannot accept terms the Guards consider concessions, which constrains both what is achievable in Muscat and what the United States should expect from any agreement that emerges.

May 7, 2026 · 5 min read

A Houthi Missile Hits a Greek-Flagged Tanker. The Yemen War Was Not Over.

The Sounion II, fully laden with Saudi crude bound for Rotterdam, was struck Friday morning in the Bab el-Mandeb strait by an Iranian-supplied anti-ship cruise missile, the first significant attack on commercial shipping in the corridor since the November 2025 ceasefire and a deliberate signal from Sanaa that the Iran war's southern front has been reactivated in response to the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports.

May 1, 2026 · 5 min read

Oman Steps Forward as the Mediator Both Sides Will Trust

Sultan Haitham bin Tariq personally invited Vice President Vance and Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi to Muscat after the Islamabad track collapsed, reviving the back channel that produced the 2013 nuclear opening and offering the only diplomatic address that both Tehran and Washington have historically been willing to use.

April 28, 2026 · 6 min read